 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
HMMMM, MAYBE HIS MISSING EXPERTS STOLE THE CERTIFICATE REQUIRED BY THE LAW? 08.22.2002 Judge Matz: “If you [Killercop] had said to me judge, I want to be my own lawyer, I would have spent a half hour explaining to you why that would be an absolutely mistaken decision on your part.”
Page 20, Lines 24-25 Judge Matz: “If you are not seeking to represent yourself you're making a wise decision.” Page 26, Lines 18-23 Judge: “But I will guarantee you that I will set this down for trial and stick to the date, unless there are absolutely compelling conflicts that I can't get out of, to get you to trial as quickly as possible. But I don't want you to start the trial before you're ready. That means your lawyers are ready. And that means the experts are lined up. "And there are possible issues, since we're talking about electronic evidence here, assuming there's anything different or new that the government has not given to us will be a matter of going through some of this stuff with our expert to see if it's the same that we had before to see if it's complete." -William Harris MARCH 14, 2003, Pg 79 "Now, I thank your honor for that, because I'm planning to submit an ex parte application for someone I finally was able to find as a local expert on the computer issue." - Greg Nicolaysen THE COURT: Mr. Nicolaysen, before you're formally relieved of your duties, I want to remind you what I trust you already understand, and I also need to get some information about the state of the record here. Have you received all of the required information that you may have sought from any expert that the court may have appointed to assist in your representation of this defendant, yes or no? MR. NICOLAYSEN: Yes. THE COURT: Have you received all of the required information that you may have sought from any expert that the court may have appointed to assist in your representation of this defendant, yes or no? MR. NICOLAYSEN: Yes. THE COURT: Is there any further work that would be required on behalf of Killercop's defense by any expert the court may have previously appointed at public expense to assist in the defense of Killercop? MR. NICOLAYSEN: No, Your Honor. THE COURT: Did you get all of the materials that had been generated in the nature of work-product materials from the three prior counsel for Killercop? MR. NICOLAYSEN: I believe so, yes. SEE RIGHT SIDE TOP OF THIS ARTICLE: UPDATE ON THE EXPERTS The SCOTUS court in May 2023 failed to rule on two cases that would have affected section 230 protections and potentially upended the way the internet is moderated. With more internet freedom cases on the horizon, it is important to note that in the past justices have noted their own lack of knowledge on the topic, said Eric Goldman, a Santa Clara University law professor. Justice Elena Kagan previously said members of the court were not “the nine greatest experts on the internet”. “Nevertheless, these non-experts will determine the Internet’s fate,” Goldman said. “The supreme court will be taking more internet law cases in the next few years, each of which has the potential to radically reshape the Internet. The odds the current Internet will survive this multi-staged review intact is very low.”
"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber."-U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) REASONABLE DOUBT "Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. (c) 1995-2026 |
READ THE LEFT SIDE FIRST: THEN READ BELOW. Jesus replied, “And you experts in the law, woe to you, because you load people down with burdens they can hardly carry, and you yourselves will not lift one finger to help them. -Luke 11:46
Transcript of 09.26.2003 Page 20 Now, I don't think it is inappropriate for the record to note that I've previously authorized experts, or at least one expert, I don't go back and check the file but at least one expert, and I think could have been more than one, somebody with specific skill and advanced skill in computer technology and internet technology as well to be appointed to represent or assist prior counsel. Have you seen any expert reports?
MR. REED: No. Not. At. All. Your. Honor.
THE COURT: Has anybody discussed with you any of Killercop's prior lawyers, any expert reports that may have been generated?
MR. REED: No. Your. Honor
10.21.2003 Page 36, Lines 20-25 Judge Matz: “Now, Mr. Reed, one of the items that Killercop has filed seems to suggest that he has never received any or any witness statements. Among the material that you received from prior counsel that you and Mr. Nicolaysen put together for delivery to MDC, do you recall whether any investigative reports prepared by anybody acting on behalf of Killercop? You don't have to say who did it.”
Reed: “On behalf of Killercop - -“
Judge: “Yeah.”
Reed: “No.”
DID YOU SEE THAT, FOLKS? No. None. Zip. Zero. Zilch. Nada. Gar nichts. Rien du tout. Bupkes.
How ya like those apples in a "complex computer case?" You bought 3 Experts and reports, 3 of them! Paid for by your tax dollas! Not once, but three times!!! THAT IS HOW YOU THROW AN APPEAL. BUT I AM NO EXPERT. Suspicion that viewpoint discrimination is afoot is at its zenith when the speech restricted is speech critical of the government," Ridley v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth., 390 F.3d 65, 86 (1st Cir. 2004) FILE A COMPLAINT
TO PURCHASE KILLERCOP.COM™ CLICK HERE (c) 1995-2026 | |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
