American Speech Crime: 875(c)
Whoever transmits ...a threat to injure "the person of Another" is guilty! ...Except this guy... And This guy. Oh yeah, and these guys, too.
WHY?
IT'S A SECRET!

President Bush pledged anew Friday that Osama bin Laden will be taken "dead or alive," no matter how long it takes ...I don't care how the suspect is brought to justice. "I don't care, dead or alive — either way, It doesn't matter to me."
Updated 2:26 p.m. PT, Tues., March. 16, 2010
"He will be killed by us."
WASHINGTON - Attorney General Eric Holder told Congress on Tuesday that Osama bin Laden will never face trial in the United States because he will not be captured alive.
In testy exchanges with House Republicans, the attorney general compared bin Laden to mass murderer Charles Manson and predicted that events would ensure "we will be reading Miranda rights to the corpse of Osama bin Laden" not to the al-Qaida leader as a captive.
Holder, his voice rising, charged that Culberson's arguments ignored basic facts about the law and the fight against terrorists.
"Let's deal with reality," Holder said. Bin Laden "will never appear in an American courtroom."
Pressed further on that point, Holder said: "The possibility of catching him alive is infinitesimal. He will be killed by us or he will be killed by his own people so he can't be captured by us."
-- Associated Press
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
"The reality is, we will be reading Miranda rights to a corpse."
Osama bin Laden "will never appear in an American courtroom," Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. told House members at a hearing Tuesday. "Let's deal with the reality here," Holder said in response to questions from Rep. John Culberson (R-Tex.). "The reality is, we will be reading Miranda rights to a corpse."
-- The Washington Post

General Stanley McChrystal said Wednesday that given the opportunity, the U.S. would like to capture Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden alive, appearing to contradict the "true" threat made Tuesday by Attorney General Eric Holder.
Obama says Bush-approved water- boarding was torture.
04.29.2009
(Reuters) - President Barack Obama called simulated drowning a form of torture on Wednesday, and defended his decision to end a practice used against terrorism suspects by the Bush administration.
Obama said the process, known as waterboarding, violated American ideals and was not appropriate even if it made getting information from suspected enemies easier.
"Waterboarding violates our ideals and our values. I do believe that it is torture," he told a news conference.
"That's why I put an end to these practices."
Pressed on whether that meant former President George W. Bush's administration had sanctioned torture, Obama said: "I believe that waterboarding was torture. And I think that ... whatever legal rationales were used, it was a mistake."

A MESSAGE FROM JULIA DAVIS:
“One of the Department of Homeland Security's primary missions is to maintain and regularly update the systems that help red-flag applicants for admission with possible terrorist ties, as well as wanted persons and known smugglers. However, even the best state-of-the-art name-check system is only as good as the diligence of law enforcement officers using it,” says Julia Davis former CBP agent at San Ysidro border crossing.
“Thoroughly scanning and verifying the identity documents of every applicant for admission to the United States is of the utmost importance to the national security. The DHS has no more important responsibility than the protection of all Americans and preventing the entry of any elements posing a potential threat. Powerful information technology puts the data at the fingertips of CBP officers in the field in real time. While the systems of checks are not infallible and need continued improvement, they should be diligently utilized by the officers at our ports of entry to combat the threats we face as a nation,” Davis concluded.
"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." -U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975)
OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA.
When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions.
Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson

REPORT A GANG MEMBER.
 
Look, you know you have to look, there! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? Click image below for the answer to the question, "What is a person and what is the difference between a person and the person of another?"

WHOIS
WSJ
NY TIMES HIT PIECE
FOX NEWS HIT PIECE
NBC NEWS HIT PIECE
2023 HIT LIST
(c)1997-2023
All Rights Reserved.
TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE. |
"I want justice, >and there's an old poster out West… I recall, that said, 'Wanted, Dead or Alive.' ~G.W.Bush

An open letter to Osama bin Laden, Muammar al Gaddafi and the "true Tyrants and Terrorists" on this page, who knew the difference between a person, and a person of another, in the law. Some even knew the difference between a question of a fact and a question of the law.

Dear Mr. Terrorists, please don't kill me. I want to see my daughter grow old. You don't know me except what you hear in the New World Order Corporate owned news stations.
Like N.B.C. I call it the New World Oder. I believe it is run in part by Hizzz Oder, Lord Matz.

Don't believe all the hype you read about in the newspapers either.
But I digress.
Mr. Terrorist, if you will find me a "good, decent, 'truly-honest'" lawyer from your country, able to sue NBC, et al., for calling the owner a gang member, and the cops for censoring this site, in an unlawful raid without any warrant, I will trade you (reward you) with talking to my fellow cops, and General Eric H. Holder Jr., whom by the way loves me to death, and see if I can put in a good word, or two, for you, to prevent their true threats of shooting you in the back and "reading Miranda rights to your corpse."
I ask this of you because all the attorneys around here suck. And there are few honest-lawyers.
I meant to say they "truly" suck.
And some enjoy sex with animals and young children.
And, seeing as how I am sure you feel the same about George B, and Americans in general, maybe you or your buddy's could rent some space here, and offer your own rewards against the, what is it again, oh yea, the infidels of America?
As a sign of good-faith, I created a custom Infidel's Rewards Page. I could let you have the entire page name, exclusively for one year, for say, ...150 barrels of that black shit bubbling out of the sand over there, that we didn't go to war over, by you-know-who.
Osama, if you guys are worried about the F.B.I., or General Eric H. Holder Jr., don't get your turban in a twist, the police reported to them we were selling weapons in the past, and they didn't even open any investigation at all, or even inform the ATF. !!!!
If that won't convince you, you can still donate below to help support this site's Freedom Of The Speech, stimulate the world's economy, and piss off an Infidel all at the same time!!! How often do you get to do that in a lifetime? Do it for the children of America.
SAY WHAT?
"Everything we do is in the pursuit of justice," said Thom Mrozek, a spokesman for Tom O'Brien. "We have used innovative legal theories in an effort to vindicate the victims of criminal activity. While this may have generated criticism in some circles, we stand by our decisions."
SOURCE FILE:

Here is our "innovative legal theory," our theory is you don't care about Justice, since your office is letting this agent lie to a federal judge, not to mention their other crimes.
But that's alright, 'cause according to Matz, his lie off-sets the agent's lie, so they are equal. If ya ask us, that's plain nutzzzz. And being as there is no law, known to man, under which you persecuted that woman, you Sir, are a traitor!
Now that's what I call my "innovative legal theory."

Wow, Americans are being persecuted now, on theories alone...not laws. Anyone else, "stand by that decision?" If ya do, contact me.
Happy Independence Day America!! 2009

Two Stasi agents are on a surveillance mission and quite bored. First agent: "Hey, what are you thinking about?" Second agent: "Oh, nothing special. The same as you..." First agent: "In that case, you're under arrest!"

Little Mohammed entered his classroom on the first day of school.
"What is your name?" asked the teacher.
"Mohammed", answered the kid.
"You are in America now. From now on your name will be Kevin," -replied the teacher.
In the evening, Mohammed returned home. "How was your day, Mohammed?" asked his mother.
"My name is not Mohammed. I'm in America and now my name is Kevin."
"Ah, are you ashamed of your name, are you trying to dishonor your parents, your heritage, your religion? Shame on you!", and she beat him. Then she called his father and he too beat him.
The next day Mohammed returned to school.
When the teacher saw him with all the bruises she asked, "What happened to you little Kevin"?
"Well ma'am, 20 hours after becoming an American, I was attacked by two fuckin' Arabs."

“If it is true that Mel threatened to burn her house down, that could be considered a criminal terrorist threat. A terrorist threat can be anything designed to induce harm or kill another individual, it doesn’t have to come from Al-Qaeda to be classified as terrorism,” explained Santa Monica-based Criminal Defense Attorney, Steve Cron. “There is a real possibility that the police department or a prosecuting agency could take action.”
("The very purpose of the First Amendment is
to foreclose public authority from assuming a guardianship of the public mind through
regulating the press, speech, and religion. To this end, the government, even with the purest of motives, may not substitute its judgment as to how best to speak for that of speakers and listeners[.]") (citation and internal quotation marks omitted);
After nearly four decades of experience in the law, Howard Matz found himself embroiled in international controversy over treatment of Taliban and Al Qaeda prisoners at Guantanamo Bay's Camp X-Ray. Judge Matz presided over the first legal challenge to the United States Government's treatment of those prisoners, in a petition brought by a civil rights group seeking habeas corpus for 158 "detainees."
Judge Matz dismissed the petition on the grounds that United States courts do not have jurisdiction over the Cuban base where detainees are held and that the petitioners lacked standing since they had no "significant relationship" with the prisoners. In his ruling, Judge Matz emphasized that "nothing in this ruling suggests that the captives are entitled to no legal protection whatsoever."
GEE, MAYBE THEY SHOULD REPRESENT THEMSELVES???
After graduating from Harvard Law School, Matz taught police science and clerked for a United States District Judge before joining Hughes Hubbard's Los Angeles office in 1970. From 1974 to 1978, Matz served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California.
A FLAPDOODLE
FAQ 1 - FAQ 2 - CONTEXT

TWITTER
(CENSORED 03.26.2023)

They all ignored their oaths, the facts, the rules, the laws, the 5th and 6th amendment and proceeded forward with a selective persecution in a secret hearing.
"Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel
With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation.
TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE BELOW.


MEDIA INQUIRES CLICK HERE.
LEGAL INQUIRIES CLICK HERE.
TERMS OF USE
DISCLAIMER
PRIVACY POLICY
TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE.
|  |