We must ask four questions:





We "must" ask four questions: Actually, no, we don't. "Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber."-U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) OUTSIDE, IT'S AMERICA REASONABLE DOUBT "Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act." ― Dietrich Bonhoeffer (c) 1995-2026 All Rights Reserved		We "must" ask four questions: The Case of 4 Questions. ALEX AND HOWARD We must ask four questions: Is the regulation with the power of the government? Does it promote an important or substantial government interest? Is that interest unrelated to suppressing free expression? And, finally, is the [incidental] restriction on First Amendment freedoms no greater than necessary? See O'Brien, 391 U.S. at 377; Jones Intercable, Inc. v. City of Chula Vista, 80 F.3d 320, 325 (9th Cir. 1996). SEE ALSO FIRST AMENDMENT. SEE ALSO THE CENSORSHIP OF KILLERCOP.COM SEE ALSO THE CENSORSHIP OF KILLERCOP.COM, PART TWO. CONTACT THE AUTHOR AND OWNER. Suspicion that viewpoint discrimination is afoot is at its zenith when the speech restricted is speech critical of the government," Ridley v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth., 390 F.3d 65, 86 (1st Cir. 2004) CONTACT COLLECT A BOUNTY COLLECT A REWARD FILE A COMPLAINT TO PURCHASE KILLERCOP.COM™ CLICK HERE (c) 1995-2026 All Rights Reserved