 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
CONTACT EMAIL KILLERCOP @ KILLERCOP.COM |
|
||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
For the Record: AFTER THE INTENTIONAL DISINFORMATION BY THE LA TIMES WAS EXPOSED ON TWITTER, USING ACOUNT NAME @AHOWARDMATZ, THE ACCOUNT WAS ALSO CENSORED. BACKUP COPY HERE.
Just like these 100 plus other false reports. "Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber."-U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) REASONABLE DOUBT DIRTY SECRETS AND MENTAL TORTURE TREATMENTS TO RESTORE YOUR MIND. (c) 1995-2026 |
In the March 25, 2023, LA TIMES California section, an article about a lawsuit filed by 3 LAPD officers against Steven Sutcliffe, who owns killercop.com, said, QUOTE: "Sutcliffe had pleaded guilty in federal court to eight felony charges of using a website he had created to threaten executives at Global Crossing Ltd. Ummm, not true!Those 2 lies...that Sutcliffe "pleaded guilty" and "had created to threaten" were intentional lies by the LA Times...to imply guilt and to bias the reader. They totally made those up, or someone did for them. EXAMPLE: "Sutcliffe set up a Website dedicated to making threats." Total BS. It was an open server (meaning others had access), that was dedicated to exposing truth and frauds. The only question is why and who paid them to lie? Yes, people were "threatened" by the content on the website, for their fraud, but no "true threat" was ever proven to have been transmitted, or anything else for that matter, by Steven Sutcliffe, no matter what the bought off, corrupt puppet says. Or sings. Rules for me but not for thee!! Hypocrites!! No means NO! Suspicion that viewpoint discrimination is afoot is at its zenith when the speech restricted is speech critical of the government," Ridley v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth., 390 F.3d 65, 86 (1st Cir. 2004) FILE A COMPLAINT
TO PURCHASE KILLERCOP.COM™ EMAIL SALES @ KILLERCOP.COM (c) 1995-2026 | |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
