|
THERE IT IS LOOMING!
"And thereby you can keep out, possibly keep out reference to the admittedly volatile and potentially
explosive term KILLERCOP.com." ~Judge A. Howard Matz
“The Framers [of the Constitution] knew that free speech is the friend of change and revolution. But they also knew that it is always the deadliest enemy of tyranny.”
"BUT THE FIRST AMENDMENT IS
LOOMING THERE AS A GLOBAL CONTEXT FOR THE ENTIRE PROSECUTION.
AND, THEN, YOU'RE RIGHT, IT DOES APPEAR, AT LEAST THERE'S
SOME SUGGESTION, THAT KILLERCOP WOULD HOLD SOME UNCONVENTIONAL VIEWS. BUT NEITHER IS THAT CRIMINAL -- WHICH NO ONE IS
SUGGESTING AT ALL -- NOR IS IT DANGEROUS." ~Federal Judge A. Howard Matz. Central District, California. Pg 59, APRIL 12, 2002 Case: CR 02-350-AHM
FUNNY, THAT SECRET PSR HERE SUGGESTS OTHERWISE. AS DID THESE SOME OF THESE PEOPLE.
I DON'T LIKE YER PEEPS! YER LKE AN UNLAWFUL GANG!
JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ: Where is the information about the
investigation of that, where in the record is that?
MS. POTASHNER: I don't have a cite for where it
is.
MS. DUARTE: Your Honor, you mean in the
preliminary hearing?
JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ: Before me.
MS. DUARTE: In the complaint about the
Killercop.com investigation.
JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ: Where?
MS. DUARTE: Toward the end, Page 20 of the
complaint, Paragraph 28, previous threatening activity.
JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ: And KILLERCOP.com is on Page 21. Top
of page 21.
MS. DUARTE: Yes, Your Honor. Begins on Page 21.
JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ: It's consistent with what you say,
Ms. Potashner because it looks like the L.A.P.D. was successful in having the KILLERCOP website removed from the host site. Is that correct?
MS. POTASHNER: I believe so, yes.
MS. DUARTE: I believe that's correct, Your Honor. I don't know details about if and why the case was reviewed
or declined by the DA'S office.
"...[w]ithout using the KILLERCOP.com, what
the web site was about and that contained the statements
about his being serious and the like, I would consider, I'm
not necessarily requiring this of the government but I would
consider limiting the government to introducing that
stipulation. And thereby you can keep out, possibly keep
out reference to the admittedly volatile and potentially
explosive term KILLERCOP.com. This is an element of evidence that it's
permissible for the jury to consider and I grant the motion under those terms." ~Federal Judge A. Howard Matz. Central District, California. Pretrial of Killercop
JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ:" When the jury receives information about killercop.com, ...[t]hey're going to be reminded about that in
a general way when they're instructed at the end of the case,
that if evidence was admitted for a limited purpose only, it
can be used only for that purpose. They can't consider
[>the admittedly volatile and potentially
explosive term KILLERCOP.com] whatever the evidence may show about your involvement with
killercop.com to reach some conclusion that you were
inclined -- that is what the propensity means -- to commit a
crime."
Folks, this is arrogance at it's height.
A FLAPDOODLE
FAQ 1 - FAQ 2 - CONTEXT
TWITTER
(CENSORED 03.26.2023)
They all ignored their oaths, the facts, the rules, the laws, the 5th and 6th amendment and proceeded forward with a selective persecution in a secret hearing.
"Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel
With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation.
TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE BELOW.
MEDIA INQUIRES CLICK HERE.
LEGAL INQUIRIES CLICK HERE.
TERMS OF USE
DISCLAIMER
PRIVACY POLICY
TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE.
| 
