OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA
"what would be the capacity of law enforcement
and of the courts to SUPRESS this kind of SPEECH?" -Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE-TRIAL HEARING OF KILLERCOP.COM
A QUESTION FOR AMERICA:
Is "pretty good" pretty much like "pretty clear?" Because I'm "pretty sure" it is not. I know, it's complex. (.pdf) But then again, I'm officially nutzzzzzz, until certified (.pdf) un-nutzzzzzz, in a competent court of the law. So I am waiting on the law. It sure is not speedy...

I'm no expert. Anyone seen an expert yet?(.pdf) Maybe the Goblin ate him!! He has our certificate required by the law and I need it to be officially un-nutzzzzzz. But tell him to hurry, 'cause I am about to get legally crazy again, on account of it. But it's a secret.
Here is the rule of law: Wherever Law ends, Tyranny begins. And that's a fact! Why? CauseIsaySo!! You are not entitled to anymore information, 'cause ya got no right to it. Git it? I bet you will soon enough. I'm all a Twitter waiting to see your reaction, to my reaction, to your Treatment. You'll just die when you see what I have in store for everyone in 2010.

Now move along folks, nothing more to see. Make like a Quack and disappear like Dr. Who. |
Fascism,
Boston-Style
I keep wondering, just how stupid are the American people? Pretty
dense, apparently, and Massachusetts seems to be well ahead of the
curve in boneheadedness.
The Boston fascist brigade is proudly talking about how they're
trying out a massive registry and tracking system of people who
have received a vaccine. The stated goal, of course, is to protect
the public health. If, however, you BELIEVE that to actually be the
goal, then maybe you should be FORCED to live in Massachusetts, as
punishment for being such a moron.
Whether you approach the thing from practical terms, or from a
question of motivations, the stated goal is just plain idiotic,
while a more sinister motive is readily apparent.
For starters, if there were actually a dangerous plague spreading
around (not the artificially hyped kind, like the swine flu), don't
you think everyone in the area would KNOW about it? Of course they
would. So if someone was in such an area, and hadn't been
vaccinated, it would almost certainly be because he didn't WANT to
be vaccinated, for whatever reason. The database and tracking
system would, therefore, serve only ONE purpose: to help the
fascists FORCIBLY vaccinate people (or forcibly imprison people)
who didn't WANT to be vaccinated. If you had a bracelet, the
control freaks would know that you're a good little sheep, and
would go terrorize someone else.
If people were dropping like flies, from a REAL epidemic, and if
there was a vaccine that would prevent the disease, the public
would be lining up for miles to get vaccines for it. You wouldn't
need to chase anyone down, or keep massive databases of who had and
hadn't received the shot. (There might be a couple dozen people
who, on religious grounds, would still refuse to receive shots, but
that would hardly require a state-wide tracking system for the
other few million people.)
I recently heard a fascist from the CDC (Collectivist Disease
Creators) pitching the vaccine, saying it's safe, and everyone
should go get it. So never mind all the doctors who are saying that
the vaccine is not only unnecessary, but very dangerous. Why are
our loving "protectors" in government trying so hard to SELL the
vaccine to the masses? If it was actually a cure for a serious
disease, it would sell itself. (Do you think that if there was a
simple, safe, sure-fire cure to cancer, those in "government" would
need to ORDER people to take it?) For any who don't know this
(which shouldn't include any readers of FreedomsPhoenix), your
standard, garden-variety flu is statistically MORE lethal than the
"swine flu" that we're all supposed to be terrified of. So if you
think the Boston fascists, or the federal fascists, are pushing
their agenda for YOUR sake, you're a buffoon. This is fear-
mongering in its purest form, which is always used to increase
authoritarian control. (When's the last time you heard a politician
say something like this?: "Wow, this is serious! We'd better let
people have more freedom!")
If there was a benevolent motive behind the scheme, it should be
easy to imagine something BENEFICIAL about the plan. So, can you?
What good would the proposed system do? You'd have a zillion
people, some with "obedient slave" bracelets, some without. Unless
they're either herding everyone through checkpoints, or doing house
to house searches, or using some other form of martial law, how
would the control freaks FIND all the people who DON'T have the
slave bracelets? They couldn't, and wouldn't.
And why track the people who HAVE received the shot? They can't (in
theory) get the disease, or give it to anyone else, so who cares
where THEY are? Any moron should begin to realize that the plan has
nothing to do with protecting the people from anything; it's about
CONTROLLING a whole lot of people, Nazi-style, and NOT for their
own good. (As a side not, don't fall for the bullpoop of, "We have
the right to forcibly vaccinate you, because if you get the disease
you'll pose a risk to everyone else." Nice try, but if they insist
that EVERYONE get vaccinated, then no one else could get the
disease from an unvaccinated carrier, anyway.)
This is a test of public subservience, to see how easily Americans
can be herded around like sheep. If it really got going, you'd have
jackboots on every corner, making sure everyone was wearing their
little slave bracelet, and arresting anyone who didn't. (It brings
to mind a line from the movie, Idiocracy: "Whycome you don't have a
tattoo?" Warning: Though that movie is hilarious and painfully
accurate, it's also quite rude and vulgar. So kids, you might not
want to let your parents watch it.)

When "governments" decide it's time to "manage" populations,
whether in a real crisis, or in a made-up one (which is far more
common), the results are never pleasant. I, for one, have no
intention of being "managed," and I know lots of other people who
feel the same. By coincidence, most of them have guns. If the
tyrants are stupid enough to keep pushing this thing, you may start
to see a new game becoming popular: "See if you can stick a needle
in my child before I blow your damn head off." (I have yet to see a
hyperdermic needle that has better long-range accuracy than my
Savage .308.)
Contempt Of Cop
Washingtonpost.com - 'Contempt of Cop' Continued from Page 5 New D.C. police recruits were keenly aware of what they saw as deficiencies...
Blacks are arrested on 'contempt of cop' charge at higher rate - Blacks are booked by Seattle police for obstructing a public officer eight times as often as whites when population is taken into account, a Seattle P-I investigation of six years...
Henry Louis Gates' Contempt Of Cop Emptywheel - At tonight's nationally televised press conference, a reporter asked President Obama a question about the July 16 arrest of famed Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates. Obama set off...
Contempt of Cop' by William Norman Grigg - The police are to the government as the edge is to the knife, insists sociologist David Bayley, who apparently couldn't explain why the typical...
Expert Officer displayed 'contempt of cop' reaction Internal Affairs
Contempt Of Cop II
CAMERA IS THE NEW SPEAK FOR GUN IN THE WILD, WILD WEST! - It's more about 'contempt of cop' than the violation of the wiretapping law.
Welcome to America Now step inside the jail cell - The audio exchange in this video was apparently recorded at the U.S. Canada border after a Canadian displayed contempt-of-cop towards the American law enforcement officer asking questions.
Contemptible police tactics - Cops raid the home of a licensed medical marijuanna provider in Washington, handcuff the fourteen year old son and put a gun to his head, and search the nineteen year old daughter and take the contents of her mickey-mouse wallet.
How To Survive Traffic Stops in America Submit, Instantly! - What the cops want is immediate obedience. Many cops are ex-military and view the civilian motorists of America about like they viewed the hapless peasants of Iraq and Afghanistan that is, with contempt, not as fellow citizens deserving of civility and respect. It is a possibly lethal mistake to do anything other than submit, instantly and obey!
My radio interview with Katherine Albrecht - Carlos Miller Photography is Not a Crime is interviewed by Katherine Albrecht, activist, radio host and privacy advocate, Tuesday afternoon where they discussed his blog, his arrests, the situation in the United Kingdom and the spread of contempt of cop cases that are popping up on the internet on a regular basis.
|
 |