 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
CONTACT EMAIL KILLERCOP @ KILLERCOP.COM |
|
||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
PART 3
First, we must define our terms. For example, someone having a short temper, or exercising bad judgment, even repeatedly, is not necessarily a fascist pig. No, a cop's level of "fascismo," if you will, must be measured by something other than just being stupid or even malicious. To truly be a fascist, a cop must demonstrate that he has the fascist mindset. So let's define what that is.
A NON-fascist cop, when he looks out at the world, would see lots of good people, whom he would want to protect, and would never want to harm, intimidate, or even inconvenience unnecessarily. His goal would be to find the nasty people in the world, and see to it that they are prevented from harming any of the decent people.
A FASCIST cop, on the other hand, would view everyone as his inferior, to be controlled, interrogated, or even abused at will. He sees himself, a representative of "authority," as having the right to forcibly impose his will on anyone he wants, whenever he wants, for any reason (or no reason) and the right to use outright violence against any who do not obey his every whim.
So, in this message and the ones to follow, we will examine examples of police conduct in this country, and rate the level of "fascismo" demonstrated by American "law enforcement." What we won't bother looking at are things like a car chase which ends with a cop with too much adrenaline in his blood, or a cop shooting someone with somewhat questionable justification. No, we are looking for ATTITUDE.
The goal is to determine if American cops today think like defenders of justice, and keepers of the peace, life, liberty and freedom, or like fascist pigs. AND NOW THIS IMPORTANT MESSAGE FROM OUR SPONSORS: THE SUPREMES: A COVER UP BY A FEDERAL JUDGEOF A CERTIFICATE REQUIRED BY THE LAW. The Judge's Reply To The Charge. "Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber."-U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) REASONABLE DOUBT DIRTY SECRETS AND MENTAL TORTURE TREATMENTS TO RESTORE YOUR MIND. (c) 1995-2026 |
Cops: Public Servants or Fascist Pigs? (Part 3)
Again, this series of messages is addressing the question, are today's American "law enforcers" noble public servants, or fascist pigs? Ironically, I remembered a video I had seen that was really bad, but that I did NOT consider evidence of the fascist mindset.
I was GOING to reference the video as an example of the fact that cops being rude, obnoxious, even violent, or using bad judgment, is not necessarily proof that they think like fascists. They might just be bullies, or hot-tempered morons. So I looked for the example I had seen before, of a rather large off-duty cop brutally beating a petite female bartender, because she didn't want to give the violent drunk any more alcohol (go figure).
What I was GOING to say about the video was that, while it may demonstrate that cops can be stupid, abusive, violent alcoholics (and they are, more often than the general public), it's not what I'm talking about when I say that they are fascists. However, when I looked up the video again, the aftermath of the event gives a perfect example of how "police" ARE fascist pigs.
Once again, the goal here is to determine which of the following best describes American police today:
A NON-fascist cop, when he looks out at the world, would see lots of good people, whom he would want to protect, and would never want to harm, intimidate, or even inconvenience unnecessarily. His goal would be to find the nasty people in the world, and see to it that they are prevented from harming any of the decent people.
A FASCIST cop, on the other hand, would view everyone as his inferior, to be controlled, interrogated, or even abused at will. He sees himself, a representative of "authority," as having the right to forcibly impose his will on anyone he wants, whenever he wants, for any reason (or no reason), and the right to use outright violence against any who do not obey his every whim.
So let's consider this example, and see what we can learn from it. Here is the video:
The video of the original beating clearly demonstrates that"officer" Anthony Abbate is a violent sadistic bastard, not to mention a mean drunk. However, it doesn't by itself prove that he's a fascist pig. Being a vicious scumbag who likes to beat up petite women is not a good quality. And giving someone like that a badge and a gun seems like a stunningly bad idea. But he may be merely a stupid, power-happy animal, rather than a genuine fascist.
(It would have been nice if some of the other people who were there had had the spine to actually DO something about it. Yeah, the scumbag is a big guy, but he was also so sloshed that his swings missed a stationary target several times. I doubt a target that swung back would have had much trouble subduing him. If nothing else, I think one hollow-point 9mm to the kneecap would have slowed him down quite effectively.)
However, the AFTERMATH of the event is a classic example showing that "law enforcers" ARE fascist pigs. If the other cops cared about law and justice, and that sort of thing, how would they have responded to the incident? They would have been screaming for Abbate to be fired, charged with assault, and thrown in jail. In fact, had the other cops roughed him up a bit while arresting him, I for one wouldn't have complained.
But what did they do instead? They spent lots of man-hours PROTECTING the thug, from public scrutiny and from public anger, using their pretend "authority" to scare away the press. In other words, they showed that loyalty to their gang of thugs matters more to them than loyalty to justice or the law. Where are the GOOD cops screaming for Abbate to be hung out to dry? I haven't heard any yet.
So once again, the verdict must be: American cops are fascist pigs.
Oh, and have a nice day. Suspicion that viewpoint discrimination is afoot is at its zenith when the speech restricted is speech critical of the government," Ridley v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth., 390 F.3d 65, 86 (1st Cir. 2004) FILE A COMPLAINT
TO PURCHASE KILLERCOP.COM™ EMAIL SALES @ KILLERCOP.COM (c) 1995-2026 | |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
