CASE MOTIONS

CASE NAME:

People of CA vs. killercop

CASE NUMBER: 0001

DATE FILED: 6/24/97

SEE ALSO: THE TONY PERSON, THE WITNESS' STATEMENT

"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber."-U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975)

OUTSIDE, IT'S AMERICA

REASONABLE DOUBT

"Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless.
Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act." ― Dietrich Bonhoeffer

(c) 1995-2026

All Rights Reserved

CASE MOTIONS

CASE NAME: People of CA vs. killercop

1. Motion to return private property unlawfully seized on 6/13/97

OPPOSITION FILED AND SERVED: 6/24/97

MOTIONS TO BE HEARD

MOTION: Motion to return private property (Audiotape) illegally seized on 6/13/97 by City Attorney David Scheieiman, in front of Commissioner Diane Wheatly in Div. 92.

TYPE OF SERVICE: PERSONAL TO CLERK OF COURT

   RESEARCH QUESTIONS OF LAW:

1. Constitution violations

2. Petty theft

  DECLARATIONS NEEDED:

1. City Attorney David Scheieiman

ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS REQUIRED

1. None  

This letter is to serve notice that on 6/13/97, in Div. 92, David Scheieiman, then City Attorney in the above matter instructed Commissioner Diane Wheatly to illegally seize a personal audiotape belonging to him, located in his personal briefcase. Commissioner Wheatly was removed from the case pursuant to a Motion 170.6 filed with this court on 6/17/97.

I wish to have an immediate hearing into this matter, to have my personal belongings returned at once, or to bring forth a charge against the City Attorney for Petty Theft, a crime under California law.

RESULT OF MOTION

GRANTED __X__

DENIED ____

OTHER ____

Footnote: My tape was returned at my next hearing in front of Debra Wong Yang, after filing this motion.

Footnote: Debra Yang thereafter "selectively" prosecuted me for speech on this website in federal court.

As did the LAPD.

Meet the rest of the Playas.

Suspicion that viewpoint discrimination is afoot is at its zenith when the speech restricted is speech critical of the government," Ridley v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth., 390 F.3d 65, 86 (1st Cir. 2004)

CONTACT

COLLECT A BOUNTY

COLLECT A REWARD

FILE A COMPLAINT

TO PURCHASE KILLERCOP.COM™ CLICK HERE

(c) 1995-2026

All Rights Reserved