Yikes! Want to read a creepy story about a "dangerously threatening" geek?





09.23.2002 Page 17, Lines 18-23 Killercop: "As this court advised at the last hearing, it would need *at least a half an hour just to describe* the dangers of my even considering to represent myself against the vast strength, wealth, and weight of the United States Government. I agree that self-representation is not appropriate and I appreciate the counsel from Your Honor." Page 18, Line 7-10. Defendant: "I would therefore request respectfully this court order the Public Defender’s Office to be prepared to try the case on October 22, [2002] as so ordered and to deny any motion to be relieved." L.A. District Judge A. Howard Matz raised a more abstract concern when he said that using BlackBerrys inhibited his efforts to "preserve something akin to the majesty of the law." FORGET THE DOWNTRODDEN AND HELPLESS OTHER AMERICANS. "Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber."-U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) OUTSIDE, IT'S AMERICA REASONABLE DOUBT "Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act." ― Dietrich Bonhoeffer (c) 1995-2026 All Rights Reserved		The Following Takes Place On Thursday, October 11, 2007. A.K.A. The hit and Run. On 12.10.2010, I discover the following article, below, on this site here. Backup copy here. U.S. v. Sutcliffe (9th Cir. - Oct. 11, 2007) "Yikes! Want to read a creepy story about a "dangerously threatening" geek? Then read the first four pages of this opinion. Nasty. Later on, notice how the defendant (Killercop) goes through not one, not two, but "six" different attorneys -- before the trial court forces him to represent himself, anyway -- by purposefully insulting, attacking, and suing them during the representation. How'd you like to be one of those attorneys? Especially knowing the type of -- "pretty" much insane -- person you're representing? Not fun. Killercop gets less than four years in prison. And, scarily, is already out on the streets, on supervised release. With no Certificate REQUIRED under and by the Law. Funny line by the district court, which sentenced Killercop to the top end of the guidelines range. Judge Matz tells Killercop: "If there were a crime . . . that consisted of arrogance, I would depart upward to sentence you to a much longer sentence." Never something you want to hear your judge say at sentencing, I imagine. Posted by Shaun Martin at 11:08 AM HEY SHAUN! I AM A NERD, NOT A GEEK! GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT. EVER SEEN A FALSE CONFESSION? I HAVE. NOW THAT IS DANGEROUS. I THINK YOU ARE A DANGEROUS DORK STALKER. Factually, Shaun, you have no idea. So you must be an attorney, and not a lawyer. A lawyer doesn't "guess" at the law before he applies the law, he knows the law and THEN applies it. Next time just ask me before you talk about me. I'm fun! Matz is the one who is not fun. And he is, how you say, "pretty" much insane? Personally, I think he is very much insane. But I'm no Doctor. Seen one by the way? PS: The correct adjective is scary, not nasty. While the public loves to bash lawyers, judges, and politicians, law professors have escaped all blame. Read the inside story of how progressive political ideology became the reigning orthodoxy of elite legal education, providing the legal theories responsible for an overweening government committed to mandating, prohibiting, or regulating every aspect of American life in the "public interest." I wish I could say I exaggerate but, sadly, the legal foundation of the road to serfdom was devised by law professors, like Shaun. Care to debate? Suspicion that viewpoint discrimination is afoot is at its zenith when the speech restricted is speech critical of the government," Ridley v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth., 390 F.3d 65, 86 (1st Cir. 2004) CONTACT COLLECT A BOUNTY COLLECT A REWARD FILE A COMPLAINT TO PURCHASE KILLERCOP.COM™ CLICK HERE (c) 1995-2026 All Rights Reserved