 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
"SUBSTANTIAL" ILLEGAL SENTENCES!
GOSH, IF ONLY HE HAD KNOWN! HE DIDN'T KNOW ABOUT KILLERCOP'S RIGHT NOT TO BE TRIED, NOW SOMEONE IS GOING TO DIE!!
Not only does Judge A. Howard Matz not follow the law, he ignores it, or just Changes the Words of the Law.
"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." -U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA. When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions. Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson
REPORT A GANG MEMBER.
Look, you know you have to look, there! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? Click image below for the answer to the question, "What is a person and what is the difference between a person and the person of another?"
(c)1997-2023 TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE. |
IF HE HAD ONLY KNOWN??? BUT IT IS A SECRET! AND JUDGE MATZ LOVES A SECRET! EXAMPLES::::: OCT 08 2004 "Blakely issues exist with regard to the loss and restitution calculations which were based in part on facts neither found by a jury nor
admitted by the appellants. We therefore vacate the appellants’ sentences and remand for reconsideration in light of United States v. Ameline, No. 02-30326, (9th Cir. July 21, 2004) (applying Blakely v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004) to the United States Sentencing Guidelines).
See United States v. Castro, No. 03-50444 (9th Cir. Aug27, 2004) (per curiam)."
In file 2004 11 8.pdf, (Nov 8, 2004) [ONE MONTH AFTER THE ABOVE RULING] Judge A. Howard Matz states to Killercop that he read the Castro decision very carefully. But omits knowledge of the above rule of the law, following the guidance he claims to seek. Listen in: "I've read the Castro decision carefully; and of course, that decision reflects what is the fundamental background context to this motion, which is that we're waiting...for Supreme Court guidance on the aftermath of Blakely and Ameline. How soon that guidance will be provided and what it will be, I have no desire to speculate about, but facing that confusion..."
NOV 17 2004 These enhancements [by Judge A. Howard Matz] violated the rule [of law] that sentence enhancements can be based only on facts, proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt, as announced in United States v. Ameline, 376 F.3d 967, 980 (9th Cir. 2004).
See also Blakely v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004). Absent these questioned enhancements, the sentencing ranges
would be substantially less.
NOV 17 2004 "These enhancements [by Judge A. Howard Matz] violated the rule [of law] that sentence enhancements can be based only on facts, proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt, as announced in United States v. Ameline, 376 F.3d 967, 980 (9th Cir. 2004).
See also Blakely v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004). Absent these questioned enhancements, the sentencing ranges
would be substantially less." COVERED UP : A.K.A. IF HE HAD ONLY KNOWN!!!!!! JUN 15 2005 "We cannot determine from the record whether the district court would have imposed a materially different sentence as to either Defendant [if it had known] that the Guidelines were advisory rather than mandatory, as the Supreme Court held in Booker. In fulfilling this mandate, the district court may hold such hearings and enter such orders as it determines to be necessary, including, without limitation, modifying or vacating its previous sentence.
IF HE HAD ONLY KNOWN??? HE KNEW, THEY KNEW, YET HE WAS ALLOWED TO HAND DOWN SUBSTANTIAL PRISON SENTENCES, ILLEGALLY. ALL THE WHILE CLAIMING CONFUSION AND IGNORANCE. YES, BUT BY WHO? AND HOW MANY OTHERS DID HE ILLEGALLY SENTENCE? AND WHY IS HE ALLOWED TO REMAIN? ANSWER: ASK HIS GOOD BUDDIES! MATZ WON'T TELL ME, 'CAUSE IT'S A SECRET!
(CENSORED 03.26.2023)
They all ignored their oaths, the facts, the rules, the laws, the 5th and 6th amendment and proceeded forward with a selective persecution in a secret hearing. "Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation. TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE BELOW.
MEDIA INQUIRES CLICK HERE. LEGAL INQUIRIES CLICK HERE. TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE. | |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
