There was a coordinated verbal agreement to attack me by the conspirators within the LAPD and their union which centered around the word "bounty." 
See United States v. Iriarte-Ortega, 113 F.3d 1022, 1024 (9th Cir. 1997)
(“Coordination between conspirators is strong circumstantial proof of agreement.”).

Once the existence of a "bounty" conspiracy has been shown, evidence establishing a defendant’s 
slight connection with the conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt is sufficient to convict 
the defendant of knowing participation in the conspiracy. 
United States v. Garza, 980 F.2d 546, 552 (9th Cir. 1992)

It is not necessary that the conspirators made a formal or express agreement
or that they agreed on every detail of the "bounty" conspiracy. Rather, the agreement may be
inferred from the defendants’ acts on TV pursuant to the scheme and other circumstantial
evidence. US v. Espinoza-Valdez, 889 F.3d 654, 656 (9th Cir. 2018)