Move along, folks... Nothing to be found here.

"There's a pathology that society has to deal with. There are people who want to display their prowess in Internet technology -- but they screw up ... [big time."] ~Judge A. Howard Matz

c

Home | A Secret | A Mistake

A Cover Up | Jurisdiction | Woe

A Ring | Just 'cause | A Raid

| Corruption | Witch Hunt | Email | Videos | Fascists | A Rape

MAYDAY IN AMERICA! c c c
c

Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player

He's doing it

for my best interest...

Liar

 

"For you to go to bat and take the case to trial or even to pursue a plea, if that's what you were alluding to before, with these lawyers is going to be totally against your interest and against my duty to assure that you get effective assistance of Counsel."

 

~Judge A. Howard Matz, Pg. 19, Sept. 23, 2002, trial of killercop.com.

 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION  - TOP SECRET

OCT 08 2004
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
D.C. No. CR-00-01007-AHM-01
Ninth Circuit Court No. 03-50558

"Blakely issues exist with regard to the loss and restitution calculations which were based in part on facts neither found by a jury nor
admitted by the appellants
. We therefore vacate the appellants’ sentences and remand for reconsideration in light of United States v. Ameline, No. 02-30326, (9th Cir. July 21, 2004) (applying Blakely v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004) to the United States Sentencing Guidelines). See United States v. Castro, No. 03-50444 (9th Cir. Aug27, 2004) (per curiam)."
SENTENCES VACATED AND REMANDED.

In file 2004 11 8.pdf, (Nov 8, 2004) Matz states he read the Castro decision very carefully. But omitts knowledge of the above rule, following the guidence he claims to seek.

"I've read the Castro decision carefully; and of course, that decision reflects what is the fundamental
background context to this motion, which is that we're waiting...for Supreme Court guidance on the
aftermath of Blakely and Ameline. How soon that guidance will be provided and what it will be, I have no desire to speculate about, but facing that confusion..." YOU ROT IN PRISON UNDER CONFLICTED COUNSEL, FOISTED
ON YOU BY MY BUDDY ALEX KOZINSKI, WHILE WE ROAM FREE AT LIBERTY TO DENY FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS, AT WILL. AND WAIT. AND WAIT. SINCE I AM APPOINTED FOR LIFE.

NOV 17 2004
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
D.C. No. CR 01-1081 AHM
Ninth Circuit Court No. 03-50383

These enhancements [by Matz] violated the rule [of law] that sentence enhancements can be based only on facts, proven to a jury beyond a
reasonable doubt, as announced in United States v. Ameline, 376 F.3d 967, 980 (9th Cir. 2004).
See also Blakely v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004). Absent these questioned enhancements, the sentencing ranges
would be substantially less.
SENTENCES VACATED AND REMANDED.

NOV 17 2004
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
D.C. No. CR 01-1081 AHM
Ninth Circuit Court No. 03-50388

"These enhancements [by Matz] violated the rule [of law] that sentence enhancements can be based only on facts, proven to a jury beyond a
reasonable doubt, as announced in United States v. Ameline, 376 F.3d 967, 980 (9th Cir. 2004).
See also Blakely v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004). Absent these questioned enhancements, the sentencing ranges
would be substantially less."
SENTENCES VACATED AND REMANDED.

COVER UP :

A.K.A. IF HE HAD ONLY KNOWN

JUN 15 2005
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
D.C. No. CR-01-00238-AHM
Ninth Circuit Court Nos. 03-50014, 03-50017

"We cannot determine from the record whether the district court would have imposed a materially different sentence as to either Defendant [if it had known] that the Guidelines were advisory rather than mandatory, as the Supreme Court held in Booker. In fulfilling this mandate, the district court may hold such hearings and enter such orders as it determines to be necessary, including, without limitation, modifying or vacating its previous sentence.

 

 

$PECIAL REWARD$ FOR THESE COP$

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA

A QUESTION FOR AMERICA:

Is "pretty good" pretty much like "pretty clear?" Because I'm "pretty sure" it is not.

I know, it's complex. (.pdf)

But then again, I'm officially nutzzzzzz, until certified un-nutzzzzzz in a competent court of the law. So I am waiting on the law, and the certificate required by the law.

STUPID DEMONS

But I'm no expert.(.pdf) Anyone see ours, yet? He has our certificate required by the law and I need it to be officially un-nutzzzzzz. And that's a fact!

"I'm not willing to require these lawyers to permit you, against your best interest, to require these lawyers to to remain as your lawyers."~Judge Matz, Pg. 21, Sept. 23, 2002, trial of killercop.com.

 

A FACT

Mumbo Jumbo Time

"YOU got too much baggage in this case. And

it's not necessary for me to make any findings about who's right and who's wrong.

 

I'm not saying you're wrong. I don't know for sure."

 

ALVIN HOWARD MATZ

Matz is very selective on his "findings." Everything else is "just your opinion."

 

OUR FINDINGS:

 

No "assistance" of counsel found here at the beginning of the trial of the killercop.com.

 

No assistance means yes, forced assistance!

 

No "Confrontation Clause" found here.

 

No "Due Process" found here.

 

No Doctor found here.

 

No "Nature and Cause" found here.

 

No law found here.

 

No assistance of the counsel found here, either.

 

The Pervert and Matz are buddies. No justice found there. Just another good ol' boy, mob connected goomba, covering up political corruption in California.

 

No Presence found here.

 

Justice and Irony found here.

 

"Frivolust" misstatements found here.

 

Goblins can be found here.

 

A fact can be found here.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contact | © Copyright 1998-2010 Killercop.com. All Rights Reserved.