The exact nature of the allegations facing Assange aren't clear, although Stephens has in the past described them as a part of "a post-facto dispute over consensual, but unprotected sex.""
RING OF THE SECRET
a NO into a YES!
You then can
rule over the masses.
And that's a
NOVEL AN IDEA.
The Sixth Amendment, which is applicable to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, see In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, 273-74 (1948), guarantees a criminal defendant a fundamental right to be clearly informed of the nature and cause of the charges against him.
JUDGE: “ It’s simply a question of whether you understand the nature of what the document says.”
I do not recognize . I understand the nature of this charge the cause - -“
KILLERCOP: “-because I can read, But --.”
JUDGE: “-I think that’s the same thing.
I understand the distinction you’re drawing. And for my purposes –“
ACCUSED: “Thank you.”
JUDGE: “I’m satisfied that
you understand the cause there.”
[But not the Nature required by the law for jurisdiction...]
He never made that finding... And the law says and requires both!
Otherwise it is
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA
APRIL 9, 2002 CASE CR 02-350- AHM
"We avoid casting our analysis in terms of
"specific intent" and "general
intent," because these expressions have long been "the source of a
good deal of confusion." United States v. Bailey, 444 U.S. 394, 403
One of the most “Universally recognized” requirement[s] “of
due process” is the right of the defendant to be informed of the true "Henderson v. Morgan, Nature" of the charge against him.” 426 U.S. 637, 645 (1976)
The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires that every person accused " shall be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation," and the same rule is binding upon persons brought to trial in the state courts under the Fourteenth Amendment.
Additionally, state constitutional clauses customarily provide that "In all criminal prosecutions, the
accused 'shall be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation' ..."
Guarantee Of Adequate Notice.
The Sixth Amendment, which is applicable to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, see In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, 273-74 (1948),
guarantees a criminal defendant a fundamental right to be clearly informed of the nature and cause of the charges against him. In order to determine whether a defendant has received constitutionally adequate notice, the court looks first to the information. James v. Borg, 24 F.3d 20, 24 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 333 (1994). "The principal purpose of the information is to provide the defendant with a description of the charges against him in sufficient detail to enable him to prepare his defense." Id.
The Sixth Amendment, which is applicable to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, see In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, 273-74 (1948), guarantees a criminal defendant a fundamental right to be clearly informed of the nature and cause of the charges against him. In order to determine whether a defendant has received constitutionally adequate notice, the court looks first to the information. James v. Borg, 24 F.3d 20, 24 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 333 (1994). "The principal purpose of the information is to provide the defendant with a description of the charges against him in sufficient detail to enable him to prepare his defense." Id.
A trial is not one of the "games that people play." The due process clause does not serve as an innocent bystander. It acts as the umpire and referee all rolled into one and calls " foul" where rules of fair play are broken.
As Justice Scalia noted, paraphrasing the felicitous expression of Justice Holmes seventy years earlier, due process requires the
government to "turn square corners." Jones v. Thomas, 491 U.S. 376, 396 (1989)(Scalia, J., dissenting). Society is obliged to prosecute those who break its rules, but society may not break its own rules in the prosecution process.
The U.S. Supreme Court recently declared, "[t]he Constitution gives a criminal defendant the right to have a jury determine, beyond a reasonable doubt, his guilt of
every element of the crime with which he is charged." United States v. Gaudin, 115 S. Ct. 2310, 2320 (1995); see also Sullivan v. Louisiana, 113 S. Ct. 2078, 2080 (1993); In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 364 (1970).
While the jury is
the arbiter of the facts, the judge is the arbiter of the law: "the judge must be permitted to instruct the jury on the law and to insist that the jury follow his instructions." Gaudin, 115 S. Ct. at 2315 (citing Sparf & Hansen v. United States, 156 U.S. 51, 105-06 (1895)). However, the jury has a constitutional responsibility "not merely to determine the facts, but to apply the law to those facts and draw the ultimate conclusion of guilt or innocence." Id. at 2316.
EAT FROM THE TREE OF THE FIJA!
JURY DUTY FAILURE! A.K.A. HOW TO GET OUT OF IT.
This page, and the rulings in
this case, are sponsered by Global Double Crossing, AKA Global Crossing, Inc.
OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA
what would be the capacity of law enforcement
and of the courts to SUPRESS this kind of SPEECH?" - Judge A. Howard Matz , PRE-TRIAL HEARING OF KILLERCOP.COM
A QUESTION FOR AMERICA:
Is "pretty good" pretty much like " pretty clear?" Because I'm " pretty sure" it is not. I know, it's complex. But then again, I'm officially nutzzzzzz, until certified (.pdf) un-nutzzzzzz, in a competent court of the law. So I am waiting on the law. It sure is not speedy...but it is baffled.
I'm all a Twitter waiting to see your reaction, to my reaction, to your Treatment and the promised Restoration. You'll just die when you see what I have in store for everyone involved in the story in 2012. At least that's my intent! 'Till then...
you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!!
"another person" and "the person of another.
Read the plan, promptly!! A man's life, freedom and liberty are at stake!!! And it's probably a prudent thing to do, but don't speak about it!
In fact, don't even think about it, especially the cowards and the easily frightened children!
The following took place on
01.17.2003, many, many months before the entertainment really began. But mere weeks away from the " treatment" and "restoration."
Killercop, how do you plead to Count 1 of the First Superseding Indictment, guilty or not guilty?”
Killercop: “ I cannot make a plea at this time until I know the of this crime, as that, ...the nature has..., nature ...changed in the past.
So if this court could
answer a question or two I might be able to make a plea at this point. Will this court answer a question or two so I can ascertain the nature of the crime so I can prepare a proper defense?”
Judge Matz: “ The court will No! "construe" the response to be a plea of not guilty. The plea is applicable to each of nine counts of the First Superseding Indictment.
Killercop will be deemed to have plead not guilty to the charges in the First Superseding Indictment. That concludes the arraignment on the charges.”
Let the record reflect the court is proceeding in a - - “
Judge Matz: “You and Mr. - - “
Secret jurisdiction. I demand my right to be informed of the...“
Judge Matz: “Sit down at the table!!”
Nature of this crime.”
Judge Matz: “Sit down. This is not going to be a debate.”
You changed the nature once. You going to change it again?” “How can I prepare a defense here, if ?” you won’t even tell me the nature of the crime
Judge Matz: “The first order of busine$$ - - “
Killercop: “They told me the
nature was something once. Now they have changed the nature after almost a year??Are they going to change it again? How many - -“
Judge Matz: “
Now I am ordering you to be quiet.” The first is to order of business complete the competency examination.
received the motion and will grant the motion, although I’m going to change slightly the language in the proposed order that the government has lodged with the court and filed .
Mr. Nicolaysen, … although there won’t be a need for you to do anything more then assist with the representation much(sic) Mr. Sutcliffe for purposes of that competency-- examination.”
Much later Judge Matz would call it a
novel internet nature. Try defending against that description.
Judge Matz was such
a computer wizard. They all are, see?
They use theory's and
opinions to make their Hocus Pocus.
the facts. And truth, justice and honor.
FOR THE RECORD:
Matz never did " Or follow complete the competency examination." . And it took seven months, rotting without a trial, or due process, to " Due Process " be informed of the nature...
novel and nobel of Howard Matz and Debra Yang to finally spill the beans. But why the secret? It would then be several more long months until the trial-in-name-only.
I have my own opinion of
Lord Matz of the Lower District and the big Nature Secret.
CLICK THE IMAGE BELOW TO SEE JUDGE MATZ POINT OF VIEW ON MY RIGHT TO COMPELL WITNESSES. THEN SEE HOW JUDGE MATZ BREAKS THE LAW, AGAIN, BY CHANGING THE WORDS OF THE LAW, TO FIT THE GOVERNMENT'S LIE, TO COMPLETE THE MAGICAL, MYSTICAL,...
." RING OF THE SECRET
ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU CAN SEE THE
SUBSTANTIAL SMOKE AND MIRRORS.
question is whether, in light of the suppressed evidence, the defendant “received a fair trial, understood as a trial resulting in a verdict worthy of confidence.”(quotation and citation omitted, like your right to counsel!)
HOW IS YOUR
DON'T BOTHER TO ANSWER. AND JUST FOR THE RECORD YOUR PRESENCE IS NOT REQUIRED AT THE HEARING. NOR IS ANY JURISDICTION REQUIRED.
A NOVEL IDEA!
Contempt Of Cop
Washingtonpost.com - ' Contempt of Cop' Continued from Page 5 New D.C. police recruits were keenly aware of what they saw as deficiencies...
Blacks are arrested on 'contempt of cop' charge at higher rate - Blacks are booked by Seattle police for obstructing a public officer eight times as often as whites when population is taken into account, a Seattle P-I investigation of six years...
Henry Louis Gates' Contempt Of Cop Emptywheel - At tonight's nationally televised press conference, a reporter asked President Obama a question about the July 16 arrest of famed Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates. Obama set off...
Contempt of Cop' by William Norman Grigg - The police are to the government as the edge is to the knife, insists sociologist David Bayley, who apparently couldn't explain why the typical...
Expert Officer displayed 'contempt of cop' reaction Internal Affairs Contempt Of Cop II
CAMERA IS THE NEW SPEAK FOR GUN IN THE WILD, WILD WEST! - It's more about ' contempt of cop' than the violation of the wiretapping law.
Welcome to America Now step inside the jail cell - The audio exchange in this video was apparently recorded at the U.S. Canada border after a Canadian displayed contempt-of-cop towards the American law enforcement officer asking questions.
Contemptible police tactics - Cops raid the home of a licensed medical marijuana provider in Washington, handcuff the fourteen year old son and put a gun to his head, and search the nineteen year old daughter and take the contents of her mickey-mouse wallet.
How To Survive Traffic Stops in America, Submit, Instantly! - What the cops want is immediate obedience and submission. Many cops are ex-military and view the civilian motorists of America about like they viewed the hapless peasants of Iraq and Afghanistan, that is, with contempt, not as fellow citizens deserving of civility and respect. It is a possibly lethal mistake to do anything other than submit, instantly and obey! Or be ready to shoot first. But aim high.
My radio interview with Katherine Albrecht - Carlos Miller Photography is Not a Crime is interviewed by Katherine Albrecht, activist, radio host and privacy advocate, Tuesday afternoon where they discussed his blog, his arrests, the situation in the United Kingdom and the spread of contempt of cop cases that are popping up on the internet on a regular basis.
EVEN THE BRITISH ARE LAUGHING AT YA!!