WE "NEED TO?"
IS THAT LIKE " HAVE TO?"
DID JUDGE KOZINSKI AND JUDGE MATZ KNOW ABOUT THIS CENSOR-SHIP. DOES ANTISEC KNOW?
have to know the past to understand the present.” ~Dr. Carl Sagan
THEN I "NEED TO" AND "HAVE TO" RESIST YOUR NARCISSITIC NEEDS, BASED ONLY ON SELF AND OTHERS YET UNKNOWN.
DOCTOR RECOMMENDED. BY 2 OUT OF 3. IT MIGHT HAVE BEEN ALL 3 OUT OF 3, BUT ONE IS MISSING.
REMEMBER, ASK NOT WHAT ANOTHER CAN DO FOR YOU, ASK WHAT YOU CAN DO FOR ANOTHER. BESIDES, IT IS NOT IN MY NATURE @ THIS MOMENT.
IT WAS NOT IN MY NATURE, LAST YEAR, EITHER, AT CHRISTMAS, AS I RECALL.
"BLOCK MY ACCESS?" MY FREEDOM? DARCY, I AM FREEDOM AT THIS MOMENT, IT'S ALL THAT I AM. AND A PUBLISHER.
"BLOCK MY ACCESS?" TO WHAT? MY WIND PIPE? WAS THAT A "TRUE" THREAT, WRAPPED IN A VAGUE UNLAWFUL DEMAND?
NOW YOU "'HAVE TO' LOOK AND LISTEN" @ THE HISTORY OF BLOCKING FREEDOM OF ACCESS IN AMERICA.
BUT THEN YOU HAVE TO TELL JUDGE KOZINSKI, AND JUDGE MATZ, THAT NOW THEY CAN NOT DENY THE REVENGE THING.
AND GET YOUR
"HAVE TO LOOK" FACE ON! HERE COMES SOME "HEAVY LIFTING. "
GUESS WHAT? I STILL DENY THIS. NO MATTER WHAT KOZINSKI "SPOON FED" SUNG PARK FROM THE POO POO PLATTER PROVIDED BY LITTLE WONG YANG, BEFORE SUNG PARK QUIT HIS PRIVATE PRACTICE, AND WENT TO WORK FOR ROBERT BONNER.
THEY ALL WASHED IT DOWN WITH A GLASS FROM THE PUNCH-BOWL FILLED WITH KOZINSKI KOOL AID. JUST SAY NO, TO HIS PUNCH.
I THINK YOU ARE INCOMPETENT IF YOU HAVE TO LOOK AND HAVE TO LISTEN. OR A SLAVE.
SO WHICH ONE ARE YOU? HOW YA LIKE THAT IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT I AM SPITTING AT YOUR HEAD DON'T FRET OR HATE ME. CHOICE? IT'S COMPLEX!
BUT I CAN'T LISTEN TO YOUR ANSWERS.
In order to reverse a district court's factual findings as clearly erroneous, we
must determine that t he district court's findings were illogical, implausible, or
without support in the record. United States v. Spangle, 626 F.3d 488, 497 ( 9th
PIP PIP, CHEERIO!!
OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA
what would be the capacity of law enforcement
and of the courts to SUPRESS this kind of SPEECH?" - Judge A. Howard Matz , PRE-TRIAL HEARING OF KILLERCOP.COM
A QUESTION FOR AMERICA:
Is "pretty good" pretty much like " pretty clear?" Because I'm " pretty sure" it is not. I know, it's complex. But then again, I'm officially nutzzzzzz, until certified (.pdf) un-nutzzzzzz, in a competent court of the law. So I am waiting on the law. It sure is not speedy...but it is baffled.
I'm all a Twitter waiting to see your reaction, to my reaction, to your Treatment and the promised Restoration. You'll just die when you see what I have in store for everyone involved in the story in 2012. At least that's my intent! 'Till then...
you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!!
"another person" and "the person of another.
Read the plan, promptly!! A man's life, freedom and liberty are at stake!!! And it's probably a prudent thing to do, but don't speak about it!
In fact, don't even think about it, especially the cowards and the easily frightened children!
But what are Twitter’s obligations in a situation like this? Should the company delete tweets that could cause problems?
made it clear in the past that it will not censor tweets as long as they are legal, valid, don’t compromise privacy, don’t violate copyright and don’t threaten anyone.
“(We) make efforts to keep these
exceptions narrow so they may serve to prove a broader and more important rule— we strive not to remove Tweets on the basis of their content,” Twitter’s Biz Stone and Alex Macgillivray wrote in January 2011.
Twitter has made an admirable
commitment to free speech, and, it should be noted, has gone out of its way to let users know when governments have asked for user information.
It’s a tricky line for the service to walk.
“Ideally, we work to get the account back in the hands of its rightful owner as quickly as possible so that they have the opportunity to delete Tweets,” spokesman Sean Garrett said in an e-mail.
It’s risky for the company to step in to do so.
“Deleting the Tweets can be the equivalent to destroying evidence,” Garrett said.
Garrett also said that Twitter can’t assume that a hack is really a hack, even if a user claims that’s the case — that was, after all, the defense that Rep. Anthony Weiner took at first.
DID YOU JUST TELL ME TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE? THAT'S GONNA COST YA! YOU MUST HAVE LOST YOUR WAY DOWN THE YELLOW BRICK ROAD.
THAT'S NOT IN THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE!! OR THE ENDS OF JUSTICE!! NOR EVEN PRUDENT. I MEAN PROBABLY. OR EVEN MOST LIKELY.
The report determined that DHS regards FOIA to be “
politically undesirable” and keeps a tight grip on the piggy-bank of information, hiding “ ” to avoid “ abusive and embarrassing official behavior both ”. The report states that maneuvering by the DHS “ the shame of public scrutiny and potential criminal prosecution slowed a congressional investigation and interfered with the Committee’s .” access to witnesses. Obstructing a congressional investigation is a crime
18 U.S.C. § 1505 states, in pertinent part: “ .” Unfortunately for all the truth-seekers, DHS officials don’t have to worry about being prosecuted for their crimes – after all, Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress — Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both Eric Holder is too busy prosecuting whistleblowers.
OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THE REASON I'M ASKING YOU THESE QUESTIONS IS, IS THAT IF I -- IF I WERE TO TELL YOU AND, AGAIN, THIS IS -- I GUESS HAS TO BE A HYPOTHETICAL QUESTION --BUT AND I DESCRIBE IF A JUDGE MATZ AND KOZINSKI HAD A MENTAL BREAKDOWN, WHAT YOU DID THIS AFTERNOON.
DIRECTLY FOLLOWED DISCUSSIONS OF ONE OR BOTH PLEADING GUILTY, AND WHAT JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ AND KOZINSKI WOULD HAVE TO DO AND HAVE TO ADMIT TO IN ORDER TO RESOLVE THE CASE, IS IT POSSIBLE THAT, PERHAPS, JUDGE MATZ AND KOZINSKI SIMPLY GET VERY, VERY ANGRY TO THE POINT WHERE THEY REFUSE TO CONTROL THEMSELVES, AND INSTEAD, EXPRESS THEIR ANGER AND HATE WHEN THEY'RE CONFRONTED WITH THE FACTS THAT IT'S MAYBE TIME TO EITHER OR GET READY FOR THE TRIAL? SETTLE THE CASE
BUT I THINK THE WAY TO REALLY GET THE QUESTION FRAMED IN A WAY THAT I THINK WOULD ASSIST ME, IS TO ASK IT THIS WAY,
TO THE EXTENT THAT IT'S AN INHERENT FUNCTION OF KILLERCOP , IN REPRESENTING EFFECTIVELY THE "BEST" INTEREST OF THE U.S., TO EXPLORE WITH THE US, A REASONABLE PLEA AGREEMENT THAT MIGHT LIMIT SOME " DOWNSIDE RISKS" TO THE JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ, AND KOZINSKI? YOU KNOW, "THE HEAVY LIFTING."
SECONDLY, TO THE EXTENT THAT I THEN HAVE AN " OBLIGATION" TO DISCUSS WITH HIZZZZ ODOR, THE DISCUSSIONS WE MAY HAVE HAD WITH THE U.S.?
DO YOU THINK THAT THE COMBINATION OF THOSE TWO THINGS WOULD MAKE IT DIFFICULT FOR YOU TO TAKE HIM OFF THE BENCH, AND SUBJECT HIM TO SOME TREATMENT?
YOU KNOW, THE KIND WITH THE CONSEQUENCES?
DO YOU THINK THEY WOULD THEN FOLLOW THE LAW?
KILLERCOP HAS NEEDS, TOO.
Killercop invites the parties to meet for a "sit-down." I bet, most likely, he can figure out a quick way to make sure everyone's needs are met. But email first, never show up unannounced. It's rude.
I am sure you felt you "need" to arrive unannounced, but they wouldn't like someone they don't know to show up unannounced, at their place in time, but that's probably a mixed question of facts and law.
anything is possible at this moment.
don't tell them their presence is not necessary. It can be our little secret.
Care for a crazy cookie?
who is we?
Oppppps, I am all out of the Kozinski Kool Aid, to go with the cookies, at this moment.
a soda, instead?
You got, let's say, 48 hours. Or until July 11th, 2011. After that date I " need to" turn it all back on...
So exercise your right to Freedom of choice, and choose you feel this email next time need to talk to Killercop.
Can I count on you to put the shoe on your head? You "need to." And again, who is we?
Contempt Of Cop
Washingtonpost.com - ' Contempt of Cop' Continued from Page 5 New D.C. police recruits were keenly aware of what they saw as deficiencies...
Blacks are arrested on 'contempt of cop' charge at higher rate - Blacks are booked by Seattle police for obstructing a public officer eight times as often as whites when population is taken into account, a Seattle P-I investigation of six years...
Henry Louis Gates' Contempt Of Cop Emptywheel - At tonight's nationally televised press conference, a reporter asked President Obama a question about the July 16 arrest of famed Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates. Obama set off...
Contempt of Cop' by William Norman Grigg - The police are to the government as the edge is to the knife, insists sociologist David Bayley, who apparently couldn't explain why the typical...
Expert Officer displayed 'contempt of cop' reaction Internal Affairs Contempt Of Cop II
CAMERA IS THE NEW SPEAK FOR GUN IN THE WILD, WILD WEST! - It's more about ' contempt of cop' than the violation of the wiretapping law.
Welcome to America Now step inside the jail cell - The audio exchange in this video was apparently recorded at the U.S. Canada border after a Canadian displayed contempt-of-cop towards the American law enforcement officer asking questions.
Contemptible police tactics - Cops raid the home of a licensed medical marijuana provider in Washington, handcuff the fourteen year old son and put a gun to his head, and search the nineteen year old daughter and take the contents of her mickey-mouse wallet.
How To Survive Traffic Stops in America, Submit, Instantly! - What the cops want is immediate obedience and submission. Many cops are ex-military and view the civilian motorists of America about like they viewed the hapless peasants of Iraq and Afghanistan, that is, with contempt, not as fellow citizens deserving of civility and respect. It is a possibly lethal mistake to do anything other than submit, instantly and obey! Or be ready to shoot first. But aim high.
My radio interview with Katherine Albrecht - Carlos Miller Photography is Not a Crime is interviewed by Katherine Albrecht, activist, radio host and privacy advocate, Tuesday afternoon where they discussed his blog, his arrests, the situation in the United Kingdom and the spread of contempt of cop cases that are popping up on the internet on a regular basis.
EVEN THE BRITISH ARE LAUGHING AT YA!!