RULE
1
What would you think about a crooked judge who allows others to threaten and racially slur you, then unlawfully raid your home and steal your files, falsely accuse and defame you thereafter, for daring to continue to expose these crimes being covered up, then let those same people do a selectively arrest, a little torture, fly you into an area wherein the entire district is against you for your lawful speech, deny any conditions of bail, keep you without a "speedy" trial for almost two years, then forces conflicted counsel on you over your objections, denys you the right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation, denys you any due process in a secret hearing, and thereafter uses this secret hearing to justify sending you off to see a doctor to mentally "treat" you, forces more counsel when you finally learn of the secret hearing many months later, then for good measure he will deny you any assistance of counsel when he learns about what happened and quits, then Matz will hold a kangaroo court to find you guilty, then give you an illegal sentence, then deny you due process at the sentencing hearing, steer your only appeal to a good perverted friend with bad judgement just to make sure it's rigged good and plenty, who will in turn then force more conflicted counsel on you on your only appeal, while we sit back and put words into his conflicted mouth and watch him admit you're guiilty, which we all know, and he knows, you've denied for 5 years.
If this is far too complex and too complicated to understand what I am saying without an expert to translate for you, sorry. After all, who knows where these things are routed. If you care to submit to his jurisdiction.
RULE
1
RULE
2
"THE LAW IS 'PRETTY CLEAR,'AND I DID NOT FOLLOW IT."
THINK OUTSIDE THE BOX
RULE
3
"THE LAW IS PRETTY CLEAR,'AND I DID NOT FOLLOW IT."
PLAY FAIR
RULE
4