I never dreamt that I would
say or write this, but I think the entire Federal and State Court
judiciaries may be so corrupt that widespread impeachment and shut down
of the courts may be necessary. At the very least, we need to
remove every judge who has ever knowingly participated in a cover-up of
the mass expropriation of real property in the United States which has
occurred as a result of mortgage bundling, pooling, and securitization.
To identify every such judge fairly and accurately would require
examining tens of thousands of transcripts from tens of thousands of
cases. But the only way that the government can maintain it’s
legitimacy is by identifying and punishing those who have knowingly allowed this massive step towards the realization of the first and
primary goal of Communism to take place “under color of law” in the
United States.
If you favor and would support
the impeachment of Judge Howard Matz, please call 512-968-2666,
512-968-2755 or 512-968-7390 (or by fax to 310-278-9684) and leave
your detailed message, preferably with your name and telephone numbers
or e-mail addresses. We need to hold judges accountable and
impeachment is the only easy abrogation of judicial immunity under
present law. I do not consider Judge Howard Matz’ comments below to constitute “good conduct” in the least.
Mortgage rights activist Lance Frances bought my attention to the case of José L. Pineda,
and the October 2009 hearing in U.S. District Court (Central District
of California, Los Angeles) in that case with a lawyer for GMAC on
Wednesday, June 8, 2011. This case is now almost two years old.
I remain deeply troubled by this case because I think that the
most important actor in this story, A. Howard Matz, United
States District Judge for the Central District of California, Los
Angeles Division, revealed an oft-suspected but never before clearly
articulated truth: Matz should be impeached, possibly along with 50-90%
of the Federal Trial Court Judges in California. I would like to
solicit feedback:
SHOULD Matz be impeached? Do Howard Matz’
statements in this case mean to others what they seem to me to mean?
I do not know how to read Matz’ statement quoted below except as a
threat to “tell the truth” about the mortgage industry and reveal
publicly that all the mortgage foreclosures (at least those in the past
10-18 years) in the state of California, have been completely illegal,
unconscionable, and that he and other Federal and State Court Judges
have been willing participants, parties, and co-conspirators to what has
been called the largest pyramid scheme in the history of the world.
Judge Matz’ colloquy with an attorney for
GMAC illustrates, to my mind at least, both (1) complete
(extra-judicially originating) awareness of and familiarity with the
details of illegal conduct on the part of originators, “lenders,”
investors, and servicers in the mortgage business and California
non-judicial foreclosure process, (2) a complete (extra-judicially
originating) willingness to suppress such knowledge against the
interests of the vast majority of the American people, for the benefit
of GMAC and all other originators, “lenders”, investors, and servicers
in the mortgage business and California non-judicial foreclosure
process. I do not think it is too much to say that Judge A. Howard
Matz reveals, in this colloquy, sufficient “extra-judicial” knowledge
and bias that he should be disqualified and/or recused in all cases
involving mortgage foreclosure cases. And if Judge Matz’
knowledge, familiarity with the facts, and attitudes towards the same
represent the typical awareness of members of the Federal Judiciary
sitting in California, then the entire Federal Judiciary is engaged in
one gigantic coverup and is complicit in the fraud against the American
people. This colloquy has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with the law or
findings in this one case, but only on Judge A. Howard Matz’ discomfort
with the Plaintiff’s state of knowledge and intention to charge the
court with “creating a false record” (See the docket sheet and attached
motion below). The degree of judicial involvement in the mortgage
crisis boggles the mind:
Focus particularly on Judge Matz’
warning to GMAC Counsel Starting at Page 13, Line 11 and continuing
until Page 14, Line 8 (the link to the full transcript and U.S. Clerk’s
case docket report can be found below):
“Now, I want you to contact your clients
today. I want you to tell them that I was prepared to — and I am — in
fact, there is no doubt about this. I am granting the motion to vacate
the judgment and to reopen — that I have set forth a preliminary, far
from complete, road map of all of the grounds under Rule 60 why that
would be warranted; that I am prepared — if this case doesn’t settle and
settle quickly, I am prepared to follow the footsteps of several other
judges around the country, state and federal, to take this case as a
paradigm for a much larger problem, a much larger financial, regulatory
and litigation problem that can stem — that has stemmed from the way
these loans were issued, packaged, securitized and then lost in the maze
of confusion that you yourself understandably have suffered from.
Ms. Vandale, you have been given an
unenviable task, and you have not succeeded in carrying it out, but
that may not be your fault. It is impossible to understand what
happened to this loan based upon what the defendants have filed. How can
you expect Mr. Pineda to understand? He’s not even a lawyer. He
has done a good job of trying to protect his own interests.
Now, you tell your clients that unless
this case can be disposed of, this case is going to be something that’s
going to go far beyond this case.”
If it were not a
distinguished Federal Judge on his bench, speaking like this on his dais
and his robes ex-cathedra, but a swarthy Italian with a New York accent
and a surname like “Genovese” or “Giancana” or “Gotti”, would we not
call this a threat of extortion? In fact, I think here from his
Honor Judge A. Howard Matz, we have the clearest indication yet that
Federal Judges know and understand the crime against the people which is
the mass foreclosure of hundreds of thousands of homes and families,
perhaps millions, in this one state.
Pineda Jose L v GMAC et al Docket Report 08-cv-05341-AHM-PJW
Read the Honorable Judge Howard Matz’ complete colloquy with the parties in this transcript here very carefully:
October 26 2009 Transcript Pineda v GMAC Document 93 2-08-cv-05341-AHM-PJW
Can the Judge actually be doing anything
other than threatening GMAC with “telling the truth” about
misrepresentation in non-judicial mortgage foreclosure proceedings?
What does this tell us about Judge A. Howard Matz’ versions of
Reality and Truth?
It appears that the colloquy in the
transcript, followed by the entry of this minute order, drafted
immediately following the October 26 2009 hearing and evidencing not
even a hint of irregularity:
October 26 2009 Minute Order by Judge A Howard MATZ re Jose L Pineda v GMAC 2-08-cv-05341-AHM-PJW
Was filed in direct response to this particular filing by a pro se litigant:
Pineda
Jose L v GMAC—Plaintiff’s Objection to and Notice of the Making of a
False Record of Motion for Disqualification—2-08-cv-05341-AHM-PJW
The “legal realist” approach to judicial
deconstruction is a frightening descent into the abyss of the human mind
and soul: our most exalted officers as “Human, All Too Human”
untermenschen capable of using their office to some really base
purposes, like defrauding the people….
But if Judge A Howard Matz is not
admitting that he is part of a massive cover-up of the reality of
non-judicial foreclosure as a fraudulent enterprise in his colloquy with
counsel for GMAC and Jose L. Pineda, exactly what IS he saying,
especially in the excerpt reproduced here above?
If I could be elected to the
office of United States Senator from California, I think it would “send a
message” that the Banking and Mortgage Financial Industries’ Enterprise
and Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations’ hold on this state
is no longer Political Acceptable to the People, and I would ask all
United States District Judges sitting in the State of California to
resign. A very few might be reappointed on an interim basis.
But it appears to me at least
that A. Howard Matz, and probably all the United States District Judges
sitting in California, have knowingly and intentionally not merely
presided over but in fact approved, enforced, and ratified such a
horrendous dislocation in the population as seems to have taken place
0ver the past few years not only against the lawful interests of the
people, but in violation of all common and constitutional law, and at
least half of the state statutes in California. It appears to me
that A. Howard Matz, and perhaps the entire Federal Judiciary in
California, possessed full information regarding the truth of the
illegality of the foreclosure epidemic as a crime against the American
People. Accordingly, I think that this case, and A. Howard Matz’
own words, quoted above, may yet serve as the basis for the abolition of
Judicial Immunity for Federal Judges who approve and protect criminal
enterprises such as the mortgage foreclosure industry in the State of
California.
The veil of “the Matrix” has
been lifted very slightly here, some sunlight let into the cave, and the
Revelation of Truth which signals the Apocalypse—at least the
Apocalypse of the Legal and Financial Status Quo, would seem to have
begun….
I hope that the People of
California will consider electing me to the United States Senate to
complete the Revelation, and the Apocalypse of the Corruption of the
Financial and Judicial Babylon under whose tyranny we now live….
If still aren’t convinced,
read the entire transcript again. Read the Honorable Judge Howard
Matz’ colloquy with the parties, the link to which appears above, very
carefully!
