The applicable standards to what I perceived to be his 'then' condition

Ain't nothin' here. Y'all best be movin' on, compadre.

"There's a pathology that society has to deal with. There are people who want to display their prowess in Internet technology -- but they screw up ... [big time."] ~Judge A. Howard Matz





"The "Applicable Standards" to what I perceived to be his 'then' condition..." "If there is reasonable cause to believe that the defendant may "presently" be suffering from a mental disease or defect rendering him mentally incompetent" ~18 U.S.C. § 4241(a)." The court shall [THEN] hold a hearing, conducted pursuant to the provisions of section 4247(d), to determine the competency of the defendant. "*Right* *now* I don’t think this case is ready for trial and much of the reason is not immediately attributable to you. Some of it is not attributable to you at all. All of this mysterious confusion about what happened to the evidence..." Page 55, Lines 4-16. 09.26.2003, Pretrial of Killercop. RIGHT NOW, AS IN THE PRESENT? "Due Process of law is the right of the Citizen affected thereby to be present before the tribunal which pronounces judgement upon the question of life, liberty, or property, in its most comprehensive sense; to be heard, by testimony or otherwise, and to have the right of controverting, by proof, every material fact which bears on the question of right in the matter involved. If any question of fact or liability be conclusively presumed against him, this is not due process of law." Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, page 500. Nicolaysen: “May I inquire of Your Honor whether or not the court is planning to make any "Factual findings" in regard to the "reasonable cause standard" under the statute since there are no findings that have been submitted by the government?” THIS IS THE SAME JUDGE IN CHARGE OF THE MENTAL HEALTH OF YOUR CHILDREN, AMERICA. In the settlement of In re Katie A., accepted by U.S. District Judge A. Howard Matz, the county of Los Angeles, California agreed to "try" to provide decent mental-health services to children in their own homes whenever possible. County workers had allegedly identified children needing mental-health services and removed them from their families, often placing them in foster care or group homes where they faced physical and mental abuse — and still never got mental-health services. An advisory board will oversee the settlement. But many advocates were left unsatisfied, including the attorney whose 2001 state-court suit paved the way for the later class action. Sanford Jossen noted that no deadlines have been given. He said advisory-board members would be paid thousands of dollars for their work, “but the kids get nothing.” Don't feel so bad, Sanford Jossen , I got nothing either. $PECIAL REWARD$ FOR THE$E COP$ OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA "what would be the capacity of law enforcement and of the courts to SUPRESS this kind of SPEECH?" -Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE-TRIAL HEARING OF KILLERCOP.COM A QUESTION FOR AMERICA: Is "pretty good" pretty much like "pretty clear?" Because I'm "pretty sure" it is not. I know, it's complex. But then again, I'm officially nutzzzzzz, until certified (.pdf) un-nutzzzzzz, in a competent court of the law. So I am waiting on the law. It sure is not speedy...but it is baffled. I'm all a Twitter waiting to see your reaction, to my reaction, to your Treatment and the promised Restoration. You'll just die when you see what I have in store for everyone involved in the story in 2012. At least that's my intent! 'Till then... Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!! It's "another person" and "the person of another. STILL BAFFFLED? Read the plan, promptly!! A man's life, freedom and liberty are at stake!!! And it's probably a prudent thing to do, but don't speak about it! In fact, don't even think about it, especially the cowards and the easily frightened children! THE END.		A CASE OF THE FACTS AND A FINDING UNDER THE LAW. A.K.A. IGNORE THE PERSONS BEHIND THE CURTAIN! AN UNLAWFUL STAR CHAMBER. COME ON, CONSPIRE TO FEEL THE AGONY!!! GREG Nicolaysen: "Thank you so much. Your honor, government counsel tracks my thinking as well. I want to assure the court. We agonized over this. We spent well over an hour on the phone Friday. Spoke again on Saturday anticipating that your honor may very well want some feedback on this very point, so we're not trying to put words into the court's mouth by asking you to make a finding [of a fact] that you didn't make; however --" Eleana Duarte: HAVING REVIEWED THAT, WE ACTUALLY ARE OF THE OPINION -- AND I'LL TAKE AS MUCH RESPONSIBILITY AS I NEED TO FOR THIS -- THAT THE ORDER THAT WAS SUBMIITED AND SIGNED ON MARCH 20TH, IS A LIITLE BIT OF A HYBRID, AND IT NEEDED TO BE CLARIFIED. IN THAT, IF IT'S GOING TO BE A 4241(D) COMMITMENT, IT APPEARS THAT THE COURT DOES NEED TO MAKE A FINDING ... "Declined to make that finding," means he forgot, or worse. "The reason I didn't want to make that finding and declined to make that finding was primarily because I didn't want to inflame him...not because I had any doubts about applying the applicable standards to what I perceived to be his 'then' condition.” ~JUDGE HOWARD MATZ THE CASE OF "THEN" IS PAST NOW IS THE PRESENT. "If there is reasonable cause to believe that the defendant may "presently" be suffering from a mental disease or defect rendering him mentally incompetent" ~18 U.S.C. § 4241(a)." The court shall [NOW] hold a hearing, conducted pursuant to the provisions of section 4247(d), to determine the competency of the defendant. MY "THEN" CONDITION? ARE YOU BAFFLED AGAIN? IF YOU THOUGHT IT WAS BAD THEN, YOU OUGHT TO SEE IT NOW! NOW AS IN "PRESENTLY." IT IS VITAL THAT YOU DO! AND MAKE IT PROMPLY! 'CAUSE SOMEONE IS ABOUT TO DIE. JUST ASK GARY WINNICK. IT'S A PRUDENT THING TO DO. OH, THAT'S RIGHT, WE CAN'T, 'CAUSE ALL THREE OF YOU UNLAWFULLY RELEASED HIM. WELL, THEN TELL HIM TO KEEP HIS DOGS AT BAY, AGAIN. AND THAT GOES DOUBLE FOR THE DOGS WHO SMILE! BUNCH OF FRAUDS! YOU WANT TO GET INTO MY MIND??? BY FORCE??? FOR THE RECORD THE RIGHT WAY TO FOLLOW THE LAW LOOKED LIKE THIS. Contempt Of Cop Washingtonpost.com - 'Contempt of Cop' Continued from Page 5 New D.C. police recruits were keenly aware of what they saw as deficiencies... Blacks are arrested on 'contempt of cop' charge at higher rate - Blacks are booked by Seattle police for obstructing a public officer eight times as often as whites when population is taken into account, a Seattle P-I investigation of six years... Henry Louis Gates' Contempt Of Cop Emptywheel - At tonight's nationally televised press conference, a reporter asked President Obama a question about the July 16 arrest of famed Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates. Obama set off... Contempt of Cop' by William Norman Grigg - The police are to the government as the edge is to the knife, insists sociologist David Bayley, who apparently couldn't explain why the typical... Expert Officer displayed 'contempt of cop' reaction Internal Affairs Contempt Of Cop II CAMERA IS THE NEW SPEAK FOR GUN IN THE WILD, WILD WEST! - It's more about 'contempt of cop' than the violation of the wiretapping law. Welcome to America Now step inside the jail cell - The audio exchange in this video was apparently recorded at the U.S. Canada border after a Canadian displayed contempt-of-cop towards the American law enforcement officer asking questions. Contemptible police tactics - Cops raid the home of a licensed medical marijuana provider in Washington, handcuff the fourteen year old son and put a gun to his head, and search the nineteen year old daughter and take the contents of her mickey-mouse wallet. How To Survive Traffic Stops in America, Submit, Instantly! - What the cops want is immediate obedience and submission. Many cops are ex-military and view the civilian motorists of America about like they viewed the hapless peasants of Iraq and Afghanistan, that is, with contempt, not as fellow citizens deserving of civility and respect. It is a possibly lethal mistake to do anything other than submit, instantly and obey! Or be ready to shoot first. But aim high. My radio interview with Katherine Albrecht - Carlos Miller Photography is Not a Crime is interviewed by Katherine Albrecht, activist, radio host and privacy advocate, Tuesday afternoon where they discussed his blog, his arrests, the situation in the United Kingdom and the spread of contempt of cop cases that are popping up on the internet on a regular basis. EVEN THE BRITISH ARE LAUGHING AT YA!! COWARDS!
		The Trial of Judge A. Howard Matz. By Psych Ward Entertainment. Sign my Guestbook Contact \| Killercop.com. All Rights Reserved. Impressum