Transcript of 12.04.2002 Case CR-02-350(A)-AHM

Page 18, Lines 13-25
Judge: “I don’t think, as I understand the case, and as I understand these charges that have been filed against Mr. Sutcliffe that the mechanics, the technology, the capacity in a sophisticated way to use computers is really much of an issue in this case. I don’t think that’s what the trial is likely to focus on at all. So I think you could have somebody who has never see a computer but is a d(sic) fine lawyer and a dedicated and hard working one do a perfectly competent, maybe absolutely bank-up job for this defendant. That’s my view.”

WELL THAT'S DANDY, THEN!! SO LONG AS DUE PROCESS ENTITLES KILLERCOP TO YOUR "VIEW," AS A LEGAL DEFENSE, IN A COMPLEX COMPUTER CASE,

LETS ASK SOME OF HIS FRIENDS IF THEY FEEL, IN THEIR VIEW, WOULD THEY ACCEPT THAT AS DUE PROCESS, WHEN THE GOVERNMENT GETS UNLIMITED EXPERTS?

Prof. John C. Coffee, Ronald J. Nessim, Howard Matz , Robert S. Fink and Michael J. Madigan

BY THE WAY, I NEVER FOUND THAT DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE FIFTH, IN HERE ARE YA'LL STACKING THE DECK OR YA JUST DON'T CARE WHO KNOWS ANYMORE?

BUT EVEN A FIRST YEAR LAW STUDENT OF HARVARD KNOWS YOU WOULD BE STUPID TO COVERUP A CRIME.